Data retention? Don't you mean backup?

January 12, 2006, 10:40 AM —  Techworld.com — 

Archiving remains misunderstood and inefficient, according to a new study.

Commissioned by BridgeHead Software, a company that sells storage management software, the report found that a small minority of respondents are archiving because of legal mandates, while many say that legislation such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOXA) is not affecting their business.

This may well be because privately held companies are not subject to the Act, which requires data to be stored for lengthy periods of time.

It's also the case that corporate legal teams, who could be expected to drive compliance within a corporation, are likely to take a pessimistic view and insist on complete adherence to the letter of the law. Business and IT managers a more pragmatic bunch -- explaining why the survey found disaster recovery was a more important driver for archiving than legal compliance.

Yet, according to Bridgehead, a large portion of U.S. companies may be jeopardizing their business operations by failing to archive properly while remaining complacent about regulatory compliancy and confusing the functions of backup and archiving.

Almost a quarter of respondents (23 percent) said they do not archive data. As a result, the hypothetical task of retrieving a vital file from three months ago would be hit-or-miss: 20 percent of all respondents do not know how long such a file would take to retrieve, 10 percent say more than a day, two percent say more than a week, and six percent said that they simply would not be able to find it.

However, 77 percent of respondents claim to archive data to some extent, 74 percent say their organization has a file archive solution and 66 percent have an e-mail archive.

Solutions for hierarchical storage management, storage resource management and information lifecycle management are all only possessed by 10 percent though.

Manual archiving dominates -- 29 percent -- with 32 percent archiving automatically with archive software and four percent archive manually using archive software. However, a remarkable 35 percent claim to archive manually using backup software -- what Bridgehead calls "an entirely inappropriate tool for tracking file-level data over long time periods and a

» posted by jfruh

Techworld.com

I like it!
Post a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Free books

Build your tech library with our book giveaways.

Windows PowerShell 2.0 Unleashed
By Tyson Kopczynski, Pete Handley, Marco Shaw; Published by Sams

Windows PowerShell Unleashed will not only give you deep mastery over PowerShell but also a greater understanding of the features being introduced in PowerShell 2.0–and show you how to use it to solve your challenges in your production environment. Enter now!

 

Ubuntu Server Administration
By Michael Jang; Published by McGraw-Hill Osborne Media

Realize a dynamic, stable, and secure Ubuntu Server environment with expert guidance, tips, and techniques from a Linux professional. Ubuntu Server Administration covers every facet of system management -- from users and file systems to performance tuning and troubleshooting. Enter now!

Featured Sponsor

AISO founders envisioned a Web hosting company that was environmentally friendly. While the company employed energy-efficient innovations like solar panels, its infrastructure produced unacceptable power and cooling requirements. Find out how AISO leveraged AMD technology to overcome their challenge in this case study white paper.

In this whitepaper, Scalar explores the opportunity to change the landscape with respect to mission critical databases built around Oracle. Leveraging technologies such as Linux, high-end commodity processing power and Oracle RAC technology to architect, design, build and maintain database infrastructure that delivers maximum availability, reliability and performance at a fraction of traditional cost.

On a typical day, weather.com, the Web site for The Weather Channel in Atlanta, serves up between 15 million and 20 million page views. But in September 2004, when back-to-back hurricanes ransacked Florida, the peak traffic on one day more than tripled: over 70 million page views by more than 7 million unique visitors. Read the full success story now.

More Resources